Could we agree that a decision not to feature a
medicore and non-notable
piece of original art that offers no or little educational value is _not_
censorhip?
And could we agree that featuring a medicore and non-notable piece of
original art that offers no or little educational value, just because it
has tits in it, is questionable?
No, the image had political content, read policy for Commons, as an
allegory of Liberty. Bare breasts, although usually somewhat smaller
breasts, are standard in images of Liberty, at least French, or European
ones, see File:1672 Gérard de Lairesse - Allegory of the Freedom of
Trade.jpg
You keep saying, "just because it has tits in it". That is specious. See
the author's note on the description of the image, "Author: Niabot,
because commons should stay free
Fred