I'd also be interested in contributing-- the BLP experience of last week was
incredibly enlightening, and got me thinking about access... having the right key unlocked
a wealth of knowledge and aid. How to make that key more widely available, or second
nature/common knowledge? I'm hoping to blog about it soon. In any case, I'd like
to come at some of the HOW-TO issues in general from that noob perspective.
cheers
dz
On May 16, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Sarah Stierch
<sarah(a)sarahstierch.com> wrote:
On 5/16/2011 11:49 AM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
Anybody interested in tackling this issue?
-Pete
I'm working on diving into the HOW-TO this summer for Wiki. I do want to
see all of these topics covered - and I'll contribute in anyway I can. Where do we
start? ;-)
Hi Sarah,
I'd be really happy to work on this with you! (And anyone else).
My sense is that there's a lot of work to do in identifying the problem -- or rather,
evaluating the collection of interrelated issues, and determining where it's best to
focus. The things that seem significant to me are:
(1) Picture of the Day on Commons often seems to be the source of unnecessary strife
(moreso than, say, PotD on English Wikipedia);
(2) It appears that there is not a clearly identified set of editorial values around what
DOES constitute a worthwhile PotD on Commons;
(3) The technical and social processes for setting a PotD are difficult to understand and
poorly documented.
How about if we collaborate a bit on documenting how things currently work? I think that
process will point the way toward recommending a solution.
I've set up a page for this project, if you're game!
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Peteforsyth/PotD
-Pete
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap