I think we may be getting away from the point slightly by posing such silly examples as possibilities.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On *Thu, 17/2/11, Sydney Poore sydney.poore@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Sydney Poore sydney.poore@gmail.com
For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the State Park?
If this issue came up in Commons the argument that would win the day is:
"Of course the image should be included in the State Park category. It shows a part of the State Park, adds educational value compared to having no image of the State Park at all, and we are NOTCENSORED."
Please do not think that I am joking.
Andreas
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap