It was me who sent the message twice (the first one appeared as a link -instead of text-
to me). I didn't know that you could read it.
Yes, that's it. I thought of a sixth section of the village pump.
For a start, it could do. The idea is to bring users the possibility
to feel that they can fulfill their interests and get rid of worries
they don't know how to express with the correct words in the
other sections. Many times problems arise just for a misunderstanding, and a detailed
conversation would surely avoid them.
Miguel Ángel
Apparently the message I sent in reply to this
didn't get through;
strange. Anyway, a mainpage link might be a bad idea - with the
number of readers we've got, the channels may get overwhelmed.
Perhaps the village pump or somewhere prominent in the "help" pages?
Somewhere internal but widely read.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Miguelinito
<miguelinito(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I mean something like a link in the left column of the main page,
or even a link in the thread boxes (Liquid Threats) themselves.
How many people are usually connected to the IRC channel and
how many are usually reading Wikipedia? I don't know the ratio,
but it must be overwhelming.I am editing Wikipedia since years
ago, and I connected to the IRC channel maybe three, four times
in all that time, not more. I imagine that newbies do it even less
than me. And it would be great for a first contact with Wikipedia
editors, much better than a cold template.
Miguel Ángel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have many accessible IRC channels, including those
dedicated to
helping newbies. I don't know if media-wiki has an inbuilt ability
to access IRC through it (or one welded onto the side) but that
might be something to consider if not.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Miguelinito
<miguelinito(a)gmail.com> wrote:
One of the most recurrent warnings in Wikipedia is
"this is not a forum". Wouldn't it be good to have a forum
in the village pump? Or even an own irc channel easily
accesible?
In Spain we have a refrain: "Hablando se entiende
la gente"
(talking is the way to work things out). In the village pump,
we can interchange information, but not emotion at all.
We can't freely express ourselves and we all feel as if we
were in a school exam instead of feeling comfortable as
with a group of friends. We have to weigh words carefully
and we are punished if we don't. That may be good for
people who are used to it, but not for everybody, certainly.
Sometimes we know somebody professionally (in this
case,
as a Wikipedia editor) but we know nothing about that
someone personally, and, when we really know that person,
we notice that we can start talking with no prejudices,
and that we even need less words to express ourselves.
I think that's one of the reasons why women like social
networks so much. They can *feel* people, not just reading
their arguments. Of course, I don't mean to give personal data,
like real name, profession, etc., but just to talk in another
level, more personal. Ask any professional and they'll tell
you that emotions are a very important part of
communication at a personal level. It would be an effective
way to improve self-esteem in people with a high ego,
it would reduce prejudice among users, and it's one of the
things that women demand from TV.
Maybe that could be a good idea.
Miguel Ángel
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Saludos,
Miguelinito mailto:miguelinito@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap