It might be a little unfair, but sniping from the sidelines without offering nay
constructive proposal for improvement is not helpful.
Harry
Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
________________________________
From: Michael Peel <email(a)mikepeel.net>
To: Wikimania general list (open subscription) <wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Friday, 10 October 2014, 19:45
Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] [Wikimedia-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury Announcement and Start of
Bidding
That seems rather unfair. Fæ is raising some valid points about how this process has taken
place this year, which are worth addressing. Dismissing concerns unless there is a
comprehensive proposal for reform seems like a reduction to bureaucracy…
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:26, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sure I'm not the only one waiting with
interest to see Fae's comprehensive proposal for reforming the process. Once that
proposal has been offered, anyone interested can comment on whether it is an improvement
to the current process. If the consensus is that it is, great! If not, then we can move
on. If no proposal for change is offered, then there isn't much to discuss.
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l