On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Galileo Vidoni <galio2k(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Feel free to ask WM2009 attendees :).
But that's not systematic and it's not that simple. :-) It's a
multi-layered issue with the attendees, the would-be attendees (didn't
some people say they wouldn't come because it was bilingual?), and
especially the organizers all having important comments.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Presumably there will be a formal post mortem, where
this issue will
be given a lot of consideration.
I'm pretty sure the local team is actively working on one internally
first and then they'll publish it to the community for more feedback.
If they're not, I know quite a few people who would be interested in
putting their own post-mortem together.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Joseph Seddon
<josephseddon(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Like the formal post mortem we were supposed to have
of WM 2008 which I have
yet to see materialise?
Supposed to have? There was a lot of work put into it,
<http://wikimania2008.wikimedia.org/wiki/Post-mortem> and even a
survey: <http://wikimania2008.wikimedia.org/wiki/Survey>. Granted,
this isn't the best-looking and easy to access post-mortem we could've
made, but at least it was one of the early attempts at teaching future
organizers what to do. We're supposed to get better every year, not
let the mistakes of last year hang over our heads. :-)
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023