I expect the photographer would have made that claim already if he did significant post-processing and that WMF would have considered this in their decision.
Pine
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Mike Peel email@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 12 Aug 2014, at 07:53, Osama Khalid osamak@gnu.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:24:25PM +0100, Thomas Morton wrote: But being dicks about winning is surely not the sort of attitude we want to display? Hardly helps support our stance as serious, rather than trollish.
That photographer who took copyright way too seriously didn't deserve respect. It's really silly that when he is actually dragging people into court, we hesitate to use a simple social defense such as this one.
Because Wikimedians don't take copyright way too seriously. ;-)
On that note - how sure are we that the post-processing done to the photo was sufficiently minimal to avoid generating a copyright in its own right?
Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l