[image: Digitaler Salon: Am warmen Polar]
<http://www.hiig.de/events/digitaler-salon-am-warmen-polar/>
*E I N L A D U N G*
Am warmen Polar. Ich möchte kein Eisbär sein. Was war noch mal Klimawandel
und wer rettet die Wale im Internet?
AktivistInnen und WissenschaftlerInnen ermahnen zur aktiven Rettung unseres
Planeten. Denn die Polkappen schmelzen, Wälder schwinden und Inselvölker
müssen migrieren. In vielen Köpfen scheint jedoch eine Wende stattgefunden
zu haben: Naturschutz und Reduzierung des CO2-Ausstoßes sind schon lange
kein unbeschriebenes Blatt mehr und weitab von Recyclingpapier entwickeln
sich spannende digitale Ideen. Doch wen oder was retten Umwelt-Apps,
Geo-Wikis, Online-Spiele und andere digitale Initiativen? Und wie nutzen
Vordenker das Internet, um Klima rettende Ideen zu entwickeln? Ist das
Internet nur ein anderes Medium für den Klimaschutz oder tatsächlich die
letzte Chance für Eisbären und Wale?
*Digitaler Salon - Am warmen Polar*
<http://www.hiig.de/events/digitaler-salon-am-warmen-polar/>
Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2016 | 19:00 Uhr
Alexander von Humboldt Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft (HIIG
<https://www.hiig.de>)
Französische Straße 9 <https://goo.gl/maps/rdgDQ6d2iJ22> | 10117 Berlin
*Katja Weber* von DRadio Wissen diskutiert mit
- *Tadzio Müller*, Klimaaktivist, Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung
<https://www.rosalux.de/publikationen/autorenprofil/profil_detail/tadzio-mue…>
- *Hendrik Send, *Forscher im Bereich "Internetbasierte Innovation" am
HIIG <http://www.hiig.de/staff/dr-hendrik-send/>
- *Tanja Loitz, *Geschäftsführung CO2Online <http://www.co2online.de>
Die Einleitung zum Thema gibt Jonas Kaiser, assoziierter Forscher am
Alexander von Humboldt Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft. Auf einem
leeren Stuhl können rotierend Publikumsgäste auf dem Podium mitdiskutieren.
*Analog* | HIIG <http://www.hiig.de> | Brezeln & Wein | Einlass ab 18:30 Uhr
*Digital* | #DigSal <http://twitter.com/hashtag/digsal> | Livestream unter
www.hiig.de
*Radio* | Immer am dritten Sonntag des Monats ab 18:05 Uhr im Hörsaal
<http://dradiowissen.de/hoersaal> auf DRadio Wissen.
Jeden letzten Mittwoch im Monat stellen sich unsere Gäste den ‚Fragen zur
vernetzten Gegenwart‘. In unserer Diskussionsreihe beleuchten wir
Netz-Phänomene, erörtern Vor- und Nachteile technischer Veränderungen und
geben Denkanstöße. Kommunizieren auch Sie Ihre Meinung vor, während und
nach der Sendung direkt auf unserer Webseite, über Social Media oder per
Postkarte. Der Digitale Salon ist eine Kooperation zwischen DRadio Wissen
<http://dradiowissen.de/> und dem Alexander von Humboldt Institut für
Internet und Gesellschaft <http://www.hiig.de/> und wird produziert
von der Kooperative
Berlin <http://kooperative-berlin.de/>.
<http://www.hiig.de/events/digitaler-salon-am-warmen-polar/>
Wenn Sie diese Email nicht mehr erhalten möchten, klicken Sie bitte hier.
<http://www.hiig.de/sugar-landing-page//index.php?entryPoint=removeme&identi…>
Alexander von Humboldt Institut für Internet und Gesellschaft
Französische Straße 9, 10117 Berlin | <info(a)hiig.de>info(a)hiig.de
--
[image: HIIG-Logo] <http://www.hiig.de/>
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Oberwallstraße 9 · 10117 Berlin · Germany
T +49 30 20 07-60 82 · F +49 30 20 60-89 60 · www.hiig.de · [image:
Facebook-Button] <http://www.facebook.com/HIIG.Berlin> [image:
Twitter-Button] <https://twitter.com/hiig_berlin> [image: Google+1-Button]
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/104662709701524780855>
Gesellschaftssitz Berlin | Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg | HRB
140911B | Steuer-ID 27/601/54619
Forschungsdirektorium: Prof. Dr. Jeanette Hofmann (Geschäftsführung) ·
Prof. Dr. Dr. Ingolf Pernice (Geschäftsführung) · Prof. Dr. Dr. Thomas
Schildhauer · Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz | Geschäftsführung: Dr. Karina
Preiß
Dear all
Please find below a message from the Wikimania committee regarding
Wikimania 2017. This message was written by our Chair, James Forrester,
according to the committee discussions and decisions during our last
meeting in Esino.
Our chair seems to be ''missing in action'' at the moment, hence my
sending the message because :
1) the meeting already occurred a month ago and it is best to publish
whilst it is not completely outdated...
2) time is running... the earlier we decide the location for Wikimania
2018, the better.
I will nevertheless add that this statement is only issued by the
Wikimania Committee and that Ellie is seeking input, feedback as well as
position from WMF at the moment.
Flo
------------
All,
At Wikimania 2016, the Wikimania Committee[0] met. The minutes of the
meeting are published on meta.[1]
We have listened to a lot of community members, both those present at
Wikimania 2016 and more widely, and decided overall that, given there
was strong desire for holding Wikimania every year, we should continue
to do so. This means that we need to pick a team and location for
hosting Wikimania in July/August 2018 soon.
The Committee would like to ensure that Wikimania is accessible across
the world for the Wikimedia movement’s editors. Because of this, we are
in favour of balancing events in North America and Europe, where many of
our communities are centred, with the rest of the world. We are not
planning to just “rotate” to venues chosen out of a hat, however. The
most important part of a successful Wikimania is a local, passionate
team of Wikimedians who want to make it a great event for the community.
We are now looking for proposals of teams and locations. This is not a
bidding process; we are keen for this to be a light-weight, simple
request for suggestions. You don’t need to have a venue locked down,
contracts drafted or sponsors lined up. You can have a quick look at the
“judging criteria” which were used for 2016,[2] but the key part is
commitment. In deciding where to hold conferences, we have to take into
account additional factors about potential sites such as cost,
accessibility, and security. If your team want to host Wikimania, please
send an e-mail to wikimania-com(a)wikimedia.org, or you can post a
proposal on meta if you prefer.[3]
There are a number of areas of the world where Wikimania has never been
hosted – Russia & Central Asia, South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and
Oceania, depending on how you define areas, of course. Considering this,
the Committee has a mild preference for Sub-Saharan Africa for 2018, but
is of course willing to look at proposals for hosting Wikimania 2018 in
other locations. Right now, the Committee has an expression of interest
from Wikimedia South Africa for 2018, and we welcome further proposals.
Thank you in advance.
Yours,
James F.
Chair, Wikimania Committee
[0] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_Committee
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_Committee/Minutes/2016-06-26
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2016_judging_criteria
[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2018
Just wondered - does anyone produce anything like this for Wikimania?
Chris
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Cornelius Kibelka <cornelius.kibelka(a)wikimedia.de>
Date: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:33 PM
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Conference: Report 2016, Outlook 2017
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Dear Wikimedia friends,
We’re happy to be able to share some news and information around the
Wikimedia Conference with you:
1) Report
Today, we have published our report on the Wikimedia Conference 2016. It
does not only describe our tasks and activities before, on and after the
conference, but also provides a comprehensive overview of our learnings and
experience. The report is meant to serve as a learning resources, and based
on that, we will share more learning patterns in the upcoming months.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2016/Report
2) Follow-up page
To better see what continuities and links between the Wikimedia Conferences
exist, we have created a follow-up page which include the major topics of
the last two conferences. We will share more updates in the upcoming months.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference/Follow-Up
3) First learning pattern
Together with our “Visiting Wikimedian” Teele Vaalma, who supported us
tremendously in the organization of the Wikimedia Conference, we have
written a first learning pattern on how to find the right venue for a
conference (including a checklist!).
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Step_by_step_guide…
4) Wikimedia Conference 2017
The next edition of the Wikimedia Conference will take place in Berlin
between March 31st and April 2nd, 2017. We expect the registration to begin
in mid-November and will share a timeline in the upcoming weeks.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2017
Cheers & good reading,
Cornelius, Nicole, Wenke and Daniela
(WMCON organizing team)
--
Cornelius Kibelka
Program and Engagement Coordinator (PEC), GHM
for the Wikimedia Conference
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
http://wikimedia.de
Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge allen
Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
http://spenden.wikimedia.de/
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hoi,
I was interested to read the minutes of the most recent Wikimania Committee
meeting, which decided that Wikimania will be held annually from now on,
and that it will be in sub-Saharan Africa (effectively meaning South
Africa) in 2018.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_Committee/Minutes/2016-06-26
Interestingly, I couldn't see any sign of the Committee's decision being
informed by the WMF's consultation on the future of Wikimania, or anyone
from the WMF's community engagement department being present.
I have to say I'm a bit confused, not least about who actually makes the
decision about how frequently Wikimania happens. Is anyone able to shed any
more light on this?
Thanks,
Chris
Thanks for that comment, Dariusz;
Wikimania London took over two years of preparation, and occupied me full
time for six months in the run up to the event. It's a massive undertaking,
and in retrospect it seems deeply unfair to expect volunteers to do this.
There was a bidding process, so there was heavy pressure to
minimise/understate the budget - which mostly comes at the cost of the
volunteers. I think the community just has to be more realistic about what
it costs to put on a 1000+ person event.
Were I to do it again I would absolutely include subsistence for the
organising team in the budget. It needs professional commitment and
professional skills, even with WMF staff support.
I do think that the movement deserves an annual event, and particularly
that the WMF should capitalise on it more from a comms perspective.
Wiki*edia is a significant entity and we should be presenting ourselves as
such.
*Edward Saperia*
Conference Director Wikimania London <http://www.wikimanialondon.org>
email <edsaperia(a)gmail.com> • facebook <http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia> •
twitter <http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia> • 07796955572
133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
> In the same time, I've seen the following problems over the years, not
> directly linked to the financial cost (which in the face of our relative
> financial stability can be justified by the benefits, depending on how we
> define them):
> - huge WMF staff involvement (most Wikimanias run smoothly also thanks to
> countless hours put in by the staff),
> - huge volunteer local organizers involvement (in fact, my observation is
> that many chapters organizing WIkimanias suffer from a motivation crisis
> afterward).
>
> [...]
>
> While we can get the money (at least for now), the human involvement cost
> is something I would not dare to dismiss just by emphasizing the benefits
> of Wikimania for the movement.
>
> [...]
>
> Instead of discussing whether we should have a Wikimania every year or
> not, perhaps we should try to list and discuss the reasons why it is such a
> big strain? If it is clear that we can't afford it every year (because of
> the human cost, probably more importantly than the finances), the decision
> to break with the annual format will be a natural consequence of such an
> analysis.
>
> [...]
>
> Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit", a current Trustee).
>
Hullo.
I have discovered that the Wikimania 2016 T-shirt bleeds its lovely color
quite liberally, so I recommend you hand-wash it or wash it separately for
the first few times, until it stops, if you don't want your other clothes
to gain a new hue. :)
A.
--
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
Just FYI, regarding the square green USB sticks,[0] that you might have
received amongst the Lombardy region travel information -
I tried to check and format two of the USB sticks (one given to me by a
roommate), using the linux utility badblocks[1].
Both USB sticks failed the first pass, in nearly the same section (block
516544 and block 515904). I will not be using either of them, and I suggest
caution (or your own personal testing) before relying upon any from this
batch.
Hope that helps. (The t-shirt thread reminded me to send this. :)
[0] with this design
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Lombardy_square.svg
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badblocks
I apologise for the somewhat emotionally charged post. Please read to the
end and I promise my argument will come together...
Wikimania 2016 gave me more emotional hot air than any other previous
Wikimania except the one I organised (2013). But unusually, the hot air
didn't arise from disputes about Wikimedia chapter governance or conference
(dis)organisation. It was about Brexit.
(For the record, I thought Wikimania Esino was amazingly well-operated.)
Before Wikimania, I had already set out my attitude towards Brexit on a
Facebook note. I've reposted it on my user-space on the Wikimania 2016 wiki
so I won't repeat my arguments at length:
https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Deryck_Chan/The_reluctant_Rem…
The title of my post gives it away - I'm lukewarm towards Brexit.
At Wikimania, the topic of Brexit naturally brought itself up in many
mealtime conversations between me and Wikimaniacs from other EU countries.
My opinion on the matter often took conversations towards unhappy
disagreement, and I would feel excluded from subsequent conversation on the
same table.
I've never felt so rejected at Wikimania. Most heated debate at Wikimania I
was involved in took the form of "us vs. y'all", so as inflamed as a debate
may have been, there would be a "my side". But not this time. My unusual
perspective as a non-white British (and EU, until UK formally withdraws)
citizen meant that I had a perspective that was shared by very few others
at Wikimania. It was like "me vs everyone else".
I felt disenfranchised enough by the referendum debate itself as a
non-white citizen of the UK. I felt sad enough that I voted Remain but
Leave won. I wanted to share the little bit of hope I still had about the
future, on the day Leave was declared victorious, and wasn't appreciated.
I shared my feelings with Daria Cybulska (WMUK staff, Polish origin) and
she reminded me to be "sensitive" of other people in discussion... an
instruction I immediately fell foul of in that discussion, as I forgot that
the UK's withdrawal from the EU will mean fewer opportunities for people
with similar backgrounds to Daria, as much as the EU's protectionist
tendencies have been reducing the opportunities for people with similar
backgrounds to me.
Okay, enough Brexit chat. I promised my argument would come together.
In her Wikimania keynote, Katherine Maher said one of the things WMF would
prioritise in the next year is to make our communities a "friendly and
inclusive space".
I'm a six-time Wikimaniac; and in-person meetings are known to facilitate
more amicable debates than online discussions. But because of my unique
background, even I fell foul of the standards of sensitivity in
communication, and as a result felt unwelcome.
Now imagine someone from a far-flung corner of Wikimedia-sphere joining
Wikimania for the first time. Or a prospective new editor from a far-flung
corner of Earth clicking [edit] for the first time. When there's
disagreement in which the newcomer has a unique perspective, will they feel
included?
I don't claim to have the magic bullet. But thanks to Brexit happening
during Wikimania 2016, now I understand the sheer magnitude of the problem.
I feel encouraged that Katherine and the WMF are making it a leading
priority for the next year to foster a "friendly and inclusive" community
atmosphere.
I'm not sure which one is easier to solve: the political mess of today's
Europe, or the hostile mess of online communities. But for both, I shall
remain hopeful and do my part to make our communities better.
Deryck
We should give much more priority for scholarships to Wikimedians who have
or will in future have visa difficulties. Ideally that means hosting
Wikimania in relatively open countries at least every other year. But also
we need to at least decide the venue 18 months ahead. That way if we know
that someone won't be able to get a visa to the following year's Wikimania
and couldn't to the most recent Wikimania but could get a visa to the
upcoming Wikimania we can and should prioritise them for scholarships in
the Wikimania where they have best chance of getting a visa.
Of course this is a sensitive issue, the most difficult countries to get
visas for are also among the countries where we have hosted the largest
Wikimanias. But an annual Wikimania for those of us with widely accepted
passports could at least be a biannual Wikimania for Wikimedians from
countries with less popular passports.
Remember we are unusual in our conference attendees. A global academic
conference is going to have rather less difficulty getting visas for
tenured professors than we are going to have getting visas for people from
the same countries, especially for those wikimedians who don't have jobs.
WereSpielChequers
On 12 July 2016 at 22:59, Deryck Chan <deryckchan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we do consider (1) and (2), but it's down to the scholarship team
> and local team to decide how they're implemented next year.
>
> Deryck
> On 11 Jul, 2016 1:06 pm, "Pine W" <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A few other issues that may be worth examining:
>>
>> 1. Whether people who have not received a Wikimania scholarship within a
>> certain number of years should get priority for scholarships.
>>
>> 2. Whether users who are from backgrounds that don't have a corresponding
>> APG-funded affiliate that independently funds scholarships should have
>> priority for WMF scholarships
>>
>> 3. What the scholarship self-reports from the past several years tell us
>> about the benefits of Wikimania for scholarship recipients.
>>
>> 4. What Wikimetrics and qualitative measures tell us about Wikimania
>> attenance for attendees as a whole and about scholarship recipients as a
>> subgroup. For example, do we have data that demonstrates that (a) Wikimania
>> attendees in general, and (b) scholarship recipients, were more active in
>> the Wikimedia movement (measured quantitatively by edits and qualutatively
>> in terms of leadership roles) after attending Wikimania for the first or
>> second time? What can we learn from this data about the strengths and
>> weaknesses of Wikimania as well as the current scholarship system?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pine
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>
