On 15 Jun 2010, at 19:15, Risker wrote:
On 15 June 2010 04:54, Michael Peel
<email(a)mikepeel.net> wrote:
> From a media contact point of view: one of the first things the media want
> are examples where it will be used, which is somewhat of a difficult
> question to answer when a) the community hasn't made its mind up, and b)
> even if it has, the community can change its mind at any time. ;-)
Taking a couple of pieces of Risker's reply shamelessly out of order...
The current planned queue for implementation can be
found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pending_changes/Queue
There are plenty of good sound bites in just the first couple of days (World
War I and II, Ronald McDonald, Winston Churchill, Rush Limbaugh) that would
have made do quite nicely.
Is this the official (i.e. community-approved) list? I wasn't aware that there was a
queue at all, although it's very sensible for there to be one so that the outcome can
be analysed properly. It would have certainly been useful to have shared this more
widely...
The objective of this trial isn't to give us good
press
I certainly wasn't intending to imply that it was - I made it very clear at the start
of my paragraph that I was coming from a specific point of view.
With pending changes, the press were going to cover this regardless - what we've* been
trying to do is get the correct information out so that the media coverage is as accurate
as possible. That is, for a given value of correct - it's difficult to be 100%
accurate when things keep changing, or we discover new bits and pieces of information.
;-)
* we, in this context, meaning those who are at the end of Wikipedia press contact
numbers.
I'm as eager as anyone to see how well pending changes works, purely on a quantitative
basis, regardless of external coverage. I'm also eager to see how well it works on the
entire spectrum of articles - those that will attract a lot of vandalism continuously,
those that see bits and pieces at critical times, and those that have a mix of vandalism
and constructive edits.
Mike