On 15 June 2010 19:52, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Though I wouldn't recommend trying it _first_ nor
would I recommend
trying it while the press is talking about. Perhaps it would be an
intolerable train wreak only because the press is spreading the name
of that article around. It would be unfortunate if we reached
incorrect conclusions on the effectiveness of pending vs protected on
high traffic articles simply due to some temporary attention skew.
Mmm. If we've got a queue - an idea which I have to say I quite like,
even if I was initially a bit confused by it - then why not schedule
in some articles that we expect it not to work very well on? It could
be it has unexpectedly less terrible effects.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk