On 17 June 2010 03:28, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote: Feature Articles are always interesting to watch and I'm looking forward to watching these ones :-) One of these days I'd like to see some software that lets us create timelapse videos of articles to watch how a FA was built up. But I digress... No FA is ever written alone, this is true, at the very least there are the peer reviewers at the FAC. But in the vast majority of times an article is built up by the efforts of a single person or couple of people working together closely. Whilst no revision is more individually valuable than the other the combined effort of that single/couple of people's efforts are generally recognised by the community as being the primary contributions. The person(s) who put in the lion's share of the work for any one article knows who they are and many FA writers already claim this by putting little FA stars on their userpage. If it turns out that a bunch of people are racing each other to try and bring the same article to FA in order to claim the same prize without telling each other and without the others noticing - a highly unlikely circumstance - then we can deal with that as it comes and potentially provide some other kind of thanks from the museum :-) I'm working on it, I really am. But the whole image donation thing is a much longer process than it might seem at first. The thing with multimedia donations is that any GLAM has to at first come to terms with the implications of free-licensing of their own photographs irrespective of whether we're talking about 1 or 100,000 images. So, simply asking for 1 of a museum's images doesn't actually make the approval process any quicker because the mere concept of CC-by-SA has to be approved by a museum's top-brass first. On the other hand, the British Museum does allow photography inside the museum which is better than many. -Liam [[witty lama]]