Anthere wrote:
--- Ray Saintonge wrote:
If we end up in a situation where votes make a
difference, we shouldn't
put ourselves in a position where double voting will
have any
significant effect. That's better than trying to
devise schemes for
frustrating the cheaters.
Where votes are taken they can only give us
temporary solutions. New
people who join after the vote should have the
opportunity to have their
influence mean something even if it means reversing
a policy..
Quite true. I agree. But hopefully, we won't change
order of dates every 6 months :-)
Out of the 6 options given in that vote, when I last looked 4 of them
had a significant number of votes. When that happens you want to be
able to look for a solution that respects all of these views. A winner
takes all approach just leaves people angry.
Ec