Anthere wrote:
Well. Other perfectly well integrated editors
have
done similar things. Ie, considering the point of
view
of editors who had made a very small number of
contributions had less weight than them. Imho, that
makes sense. Also, he did not try to "cheat" and
make
the change with noone being aware of it, since he
put
a comment.
I think were more and more things be decided by
votes
(how sad), there is perhaps need to check whether
there is no double voting.
If we end up in a situation where votes make a
difference, we shouldn't
put ourselves in a position where double voting will
have any
significant effect. That's better than trying to
devise schemes for
frustrating the cheaters.
Where votes are taken they can only give us
temporary solutions. New
people who join after the vote should have the
opportunity to have their
influence mean something even if it means reversing
a policy..
Quite true. I agree. But hopefully, we won't change
order of dates every 6 months :-)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!