Anthere wrote:
--- Ray Saintonge wrote:
If we end up in a situation where votes make a difference, we shouldn't put ourselves in a position where double voting will have any significant effect. That's better than trying to devise schemes for frustrating the cheaters.
Where votes are taken they can only give us temporary solutions. New people who join after the vote should have the opportunity to have their influence mean something even if it means reversing a policy..
Quite true. I agree. But hopefully, we won't change order of dates every 6 months :-)
Out of the 6 options given in that vote, when I last looked 4 of them had a significant number of votes. When that happens you want to be able to look for a solution that respects all of these views. A winner takes all approach just leaves people angry.
Ec