I have long felt that the wikipedia needs a better division of labour.
For example, users who contribute bulk content tend to have trouble
with NPOV. Users who edit (making redirects and improving wording and
seeking NPOV) tend to get less credit for the finished product. And
people who focus on policy pages and the wikipedia namespace tend to
become admins more than those who do not. I find the
anon/user/admin/bureaucrat/developer distinction an unfortunate one.
Too often people are punished rather than praised for their efforts by
a system that rewards cliqiness and attempts to modify behaviour with
punitive and legalistic process and punishments. We need a way to
maximise strengths, minimize weaknesses, and REWARD good behaviour.
Jack (Sam Spade)