I have long felt that the wikipedia needs a better division of labour. For example, users who contribute bulk content tend to have trouble with NPOV. Users who edit (making redirects and improving wording and seeking NPOV) tend to get less credit for the finished product. And people who focus on policy pages and the wikipedia namespace tend to become admins more than those who do not. I find the anon/user/admin/bureaucrat/developer distinction an unfortunate one. Too often people are punished rather than praised for their efforts by a system that rewards cliqiness and attempts to modify behaviour with punitive and legalistic process and punishments. We need a way to maximise strengths, minimize weaknesses, and REWARD good behaviour.
Jack (Sam Spade)