It gets better - there is a proposal on WT:BLP to
change the normal
operation of a consensus discussion so that, for BLP articles, its
backwards. If this proposal makes its way into policy, the outcome will
be
this: if an editor nominates a BLP article for deletion, and no consensus
for deletion is achieved, it will be deleted. I personally can't see how
that makes sense, but apparently a few of the folks on WT:BLP can. Maybe
we
need a new process - Articles for Keep, where all nominated articles are
deleted unless enough people come by to make argue for keeping them.
Nathan
I can certainly understand. We have about 200 folks who want to keep
Giovanno di Stefano, a monstrosity that is entirely uncontrollable. I
wonder how many of them are willing to spend hours, week, months, years
monitoring it.
Fred