In a message dated 3/4/2007 12:30:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
jaap.vermeulen(a)gmail.com writes:
I'd appreciate further feedback, since I'm not sure how I should proceed
here.
Jaap Vermeulen
I brought up Wikipedia on a nonprofit org list. It was after I was unfairly
blocked, and I get a lot of awkward and/or inappropriate arguments from
those in power at Wikipedia, but I also get ignored and see them elsewhere - or
something like them. However, the subject came up regarding how corporations
pay and even involve their legal teams on Wikipedia articles.
I do want to say that it's questionable to have good faith when you see a
lot of stuff wrong, including using good faith like a religion. However, from
what I see, at least you have ethics as an editor (and administrator no
less). I think Wikipedia needs more checks on admins, and there's a lot of
unfairness in the process right now.
Vincent Bartning
UN: John Wallace Rich
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now
offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.