In a message dated 3/4/2007 12:30:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, jaap.vermeulen(a)gmail.com writes: I'd appreciate further feedback, since I'm not sure how I should proceed here. Jaap Vermeulen I brought up Wikipedia on a nonprofit org list. It was after I was unfairly blocked, and I get a lot of awkward and/or inappropriate arguments from those in power at Wikipedia, but I also get ignored and see them elsewhere - or something like them. However, the subject came up regarding how corporations pay and even involve their legal teams on Wikipedia articles. I do want to say that it's questionable to have good faith when you see a lot of stuff wrong, including using good faith like a religion. However, from what I see, at least you have ethics as an editor (and administrator no less). I think Wikipedia needs more checks on admins, and there's a lot of unfairness in the process right now. Vincent Bartning UN: John Wallace Rich <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.