Poppycock. Bring me a shrubbery as well, why don't you? Who the hell equated pompous
longevity with excellence? Since when was blessed brevity a vice, when it is the purest of
all virtues? I've written articles starting with just one line "X is a
person", with added categories - tell me that is not an excellent article. I've
written up full plots of 4-hour baroque opera and I've written little cameos in
virtuosity such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuseppe_Millico - tell me excellence
cannot be found in both. Try and fail.
Moreschi
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:47:52 +0100
From: phoenix.wiki(a)gmail.com
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Excellent short articles
On 10/20/07, Majorly <axel9891(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 20/10/2007, Phoenix wiki <phoenix.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Surely an excellent article can't be
short?
Oh yes it can.
Oh no it can't. It can be very good but if it's under 50-60 lines long then
it can't be excellent
Phoenix 15
_________________________________________________________________
Celeb spotting – Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes
https://www.celebmashup.com