"Wikipedia strives to be accurate and neutral."
That is ONLY what is "presumed" Wikipedia "strives
for", Ed.
"Anti-semitic sites such as Mr. Vogel wants linked
directly from the "Judaism" or "Jew" articles is
neither."
Why not, Ed?
"Anti-cosmotheism sites" such as the very false and
slanderous four ones that David Gerard has linked to
as being "criticisms" of [[cosmotheism]] are hardly at
all "accurate" nor "neutral" pov's? Why the NPOV
DOUBLE-STANDARD, Ed?
"In the interests of bending over backwards to be
fair, however, I would like to see that link put
SOMEWHERE."
Indeed!
Actually, "fairness" and a Wiki NPOV would be ALSO
either mean deleting the "false and slanderous four
pov "criticism" links at [[cosmotheism]] or allowing
the pov "criticism" link of [
http://www.jewwatch.com]
to [Judaism]. That would avoid DOUBLE-STANDARDS and a
NPOV within Wikipedia, and no more and no less, Ed.
"How about [[Holocaust denial]] or
[[Anti-Semitism]]?"
Neither one of those two articles are actually NPOV,
are they Ed?, so I don't think so.
Actually, "fairness" and a Wiki NPOV would be ALSO
either mean deleting the "false and slanderous four
pov "criticism" links at [[cosmotheism]] or allowing
the pov "criticism" link of [
http://www.jewwatch.com]
to [Judaism]. That would avoid DOUBLE-STANDARDS and a
NPOV within Wikipedia, and no more and no less, Ed.
That would be an acceptable "COMPROMISE" that actually
enforces a Wiki NPOV and without ANY POV BIAS and pov
DOUBLE-STANDARDS, Ed.
Best regards,
Paul Vogel
http://www.cosmotheism.net
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover