"Wikipedia strives to be accurate and neutral."
That is ONLY what is "presumed" Wikipedia "strives for", Ed.
"Anti-semitic sites such as Mr. Vogel wants linked directly from the "Judaism" or "Jew" articles is neither."
Why not, Ed?
"Anti-cosmotheism sites" such as the very false and slanderous four ones that David Gerard has linked to as being "criticisms" of [[cosmotheism]] are hardly at all "accurate" nor "neutral" pov's? Why the NPOV DOUBLE-STANDARD, Ed?
"In the interests of bending over backwards to be fair, however, I would like to see that link put SOMEWHERE."
Indeed!
Actually, "fairness" and a Wiki NPOV would be ALSO either mean deleting the "false and slanderous four pov "criticism" links at [[cosmotheism]] or allowing the pov "criticism" link of [http://www.jewwatch.com] to [Judaism]. That would avoid DOUBLE-STANDARDS and a NPOV within Wikipedia, and no more and no less, Ed.
"How about [[Holocaust denial]] or [[Anti-Semitism]]?"
Neither one of those two articles are actually NPOV, are they Ed?, so I don't think so.
Actually, "fairness" and a Wiki NPOV would be ALSO either mean deleting the "false and slanderous four pov "criticism" links at [[cosmotheism]] or allowing the pov "criticism" link of [http://www.jewwatch.com] to [Judaism]. That would avoid DOUBLE-STANDARDS and a NPOV within Wikipedia, and no more and no less, Ed.
That would be an acceptable "COMPROMISE" that actually enforces a Wiki NPOV and without ANY POV BIAS and pov DOUBLE-STANDARDS, Ed.
Best regards,
Paul Vogel
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover