On 29/11/2010 20:18, MuZemike wrote:
Absolutely agree. There are a lot of articles that are
not assessed
(though, for all intents and purposes, WikiProject assessments are not
exactly the same as stub-tagging on the actual article page itself) at
all, as well as a lot of articles that are still stub-tagged and are in
fact no longer stubs. We need to keep that in mind when assigning a
number or percentage of stubs on en.wiki, as the numbers will most
certainly be off.
So does clicking "Random Article" and (gasp) judging
for one's own self
what is a stub produce a figure very different from 50%?
Charles