Perhaps you can explain why I am required to act in this way but not the
likes of Violet Riga, Matt Crypto or lots of other people.
My annoyance started when Violet Riga got me blocked on a totally
spurious request and has both not been punished and has nor apologized.
It is referenced earlier on, in the thread.
I am quiet happy to have all my stuff up there provided other peoples is
subject to the same conditions, but that does not seem to be the case.
For instance I am chastised for not replying to people were as David
Gerrard and most of the members of the arbcomm feel that they do not
have to reply.
Or for instance why Pcpcpc would use a sock puppet to perform edits of
extremely dubious quality and then not explain why he acted the way he
did.
As for spam, the address is on several WWW sites as a contact so it is
virtually impossible to make it worse and Spamihilator seems up to the job.
I've also had this email for about 15 years now, which also means it is well
known.
You'll find I have used a spell checker but there is no guarantee that word
correctly spelt is the right word.
Date sent: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:07:05 +0930
From: Alphax <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] It is a sign.
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Send reply to: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
<mailto:wikien-l-request@Wikipedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:wikien-l-request@Wikipedia.org?subject=subscribe>
John Bradley wrote:
What personal attacks have I made because I have
been repremanded?
My disgust strtches far further back than that.
When did it start and why?
It also yet again seems that I what I have done is
a personall attack then so
is everyones critisms of me. another example of 1 rule for the arbcommas.
I'm not on the Arbcom, but calling people "stupid immature idiots"
won't
help your case. Talking about "invalid, illogical, unreferenced, biased
claims" in articles might - attack the idea, never the person.
My request for a page to be deleted was not spam,
that several people
have decided to use it as an opportunity to rake over the coals is not my
problem.
What a person has in their user space is their concern unless it breaks
policy (eg. is defamatory, illegal). Many people have pages like this as
watchlists.
Don't forget the disclaimer that you submitted all entries to Wikipedia
under - All contributions to Wikipedia are released under the GNU Free
Documentation License. The history of the mistakes you have made in the
past cannot be erased, but that doesn't mean you have to make them in
the future. Be polite, discuss things, never revert without talking
about what you are doing and why.
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and
those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Yours
John Bradley
Loc: Flat 15/22 Gambier Terrace, Liverpool, L1 7BL, UK.
Phone: +44 (0)151 708 7238
Email: john(a)ontobus.co.uk
WWW: