On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:50 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's actually a really good idea.
To expand upon the idea. AFD rules would remain the same for BLPs and
non BLPs (notable or not notable) with "no consensus" defaulting to
"keep". However, if the subject requests deletion or otherwise starts
to make trouble for the project, then his article would go to "BLPs
for discussion" Where the article would be deleted (or stubified and
protected) unless there is a clean consensus to keep.
I can't express my opposition to this strongly enough. We should under
no circumstances *encourage* people to try to damage the encyclopedia by
giving them a special process by which to do so.
-Mark