RE: [WikiEN-l] What to do

Admins must not protect pages they are actively engaged in editing, except in the case of simple vandalism. So, one person violates "It is considered polite", and another violates "Admins must not". You don't really think you're in the right here, do you? I can understand how things happen in the heat of the moment, but in retrospect, it's pretty clear which one of you is at fault. It seems that Drini was acting in the bests interests of WP - he even stated in the edit summary "rm aggressive divisive userbox". For what it's worth, here's the edit history of The Cunctator's user page. # (cur) (last) 03:41, 7 February 2006 The Cunctator (It's getting a bit --what's the word -- nicey nicey? velvet rope? mm.) # (cur) (last) 03:16, 7 February 2006 The Cunctator m (I like how I've been managing to make fun of userboxes from day one without even knowing it. Now it even looks like one!) # (cur) (last) 03:10, 7 February 2006 The Cunctator m # (cur) (last) 02:46, 7 February 2006 The Cunctator (The Featured articles are, imho, some of the worst entries in Wikipedia.) # (cur) (last) 16:11, 6 February 2006 The Cunctator m # (cur) (last) 16:11, 6 February 2006 The Cunctator (Here's a more polite version, you sanctimonious jerk.) # (cur) (last) 06:55, 6 February 2006 Drini (yes but it goes against WP:CIVIL policy) # (cur) (last) 04:45, 6 February 2006 The Cunctator (For the second time.) # (cur) (last) 21:53, 5 February 2006 Drini (rm aggresive attacking userbox) # (cur) (last) 20:50, 5 February 2006 The Cunctator m (I'd like to be able to state my own opinions.) # (cur) (last) 22:13, 4 February 2006 Drini (rm aggressive divisive userbox) Sorry, I'll let it go now. Just a bit disappointed. Steve