The question is: In the case of someone who is definitely not behaving
themselves here, can other internet activities be considered as we try to
deal with them? Especially in evaluating whether we are dealing with a
lifestyle as opposed to limited situational offenses.
Fred
From: "Poor, Edmund W"
<Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:35:03 -0500
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] outside evidence and arbitration
Delirium raises the "track record" question rather eloquently.
My own view is:
* Trouble caused elsewhere should ALERT US that it might spread here.
* Generally, users should get a clean slate (see AssumeGoodFaith).
So I'd say the committees should avoid bringing up "outside activities"
and using them against Wikipedians. No matter how they act elsewhere, as
long as they behave themselves here.
Ed Poor
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l