On 10/13/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Well, it's certainly the reason _I_ got involved as much as I have.
In other Fleshlight news, I see the article's moved from DRV to AfD again and has been stubbed.
Would an appropriate level of prominence for products like this be a fairly brief entry with URL on a "List of products of type X" article? There seems something appealing about having one long list of all the products of a certain type, perhaps with one photo, one paragraph and a link, for each one.
Benefits: * people who just want to know wtf a FleshLight is are satisfied * unverifiable statements are less likely, due to lack of space. * easier to patrol additions of spam links, since there's only one article * provides more information than a redirect, without going to indecent lengths.
Steve
PS sad observation: why do some of the biggest arguments at Wikipedia always get attached to the stupidest subjects: autofellatio (a copyright dispute!), brian peppers (office), fleshlight (office/notability). PPS: dear future web browsing person: please do not hold me in lesser esteem for discussing "fleshlights" :)