On 10/13/06, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Well, it's certainly the reason _I_ got involved
as much as I have.
In other Fleshlight news, I see the article's moved from DRV to AfD
again and has been stubbed.
Would an appropriate level of prominence for products like this be a
fairly brief entry with URL on a "List of products of type X" article?
There seems something appealing about having one long list of all the
products of a certain type, perhaps with one photo, one paragraph and
a link, for each one.
Benefits:
* people who just want to know wtf a FleshLight is are satisfied
* unverifiable statements are less likely, due to lack of space.
* easier to patrol additions of spam links, since there's only one article
* provides more information than a redirect, without going to indecent lengths.
Steve
PS sad observation: why do some of the biggest arguments at Wikipedia
always get attached to the stupidest subjects: autofellatio (a
copyright dispute!), brian peppers (office), fleshlight
(office/notability).
PPS: dear future web browsing person: please do not hold me in lesser
esteem for discussing "fleshlights" :)