John Bradley wrote:
Perhaps you can explain why I am required to act in
this way but not the
likes of Violet Riga, Matt Crypto or lots of other people.
They are too. Do you have examples of when they have done this?
My annoyance started when Violet Riga got me blocked on
a totally
spurious request and has both not been punished and has nor apologized.
It is referenced earlier on, in the thread.
Which one?
I am quiet happy to have all my stuff up there provided
other peoples is
subject to the same conditions, but that does not seem to be the case.
I'd like to see some of these violations.
For instance I am chastised for not replying to people
were as David
Gerrard and most of the members of the arbcomm feel that they do not
have to reply.
Sorry, can't answer that without a reference.
Or for instance why Pcpcpc would use a sock puppet to
perform edits of
extremely dubious quality and then not explain why he acted the way he
did.
Unfortunately tracking sockpuppets is quite difficult. Can you provide a
diff?
As for spam, the address is on several WWW sites as a
contact so it is
virtually impossible to make it worse and Spamihilator seems up to the job.
I've also had this email for about 15 years now, which also means it is well
known.
My concern about your address is about your *residential* address.
You'll find I have used a spell checker but there
is no guarantee that word
correctly spelt is the right word.
Spell checkers are notoriously innaccurate. They also can't check grammar.
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis