John Bradley wrote:
Perhaps you can explain why I am required to act in this way but not the likes of Violet Riga, Matt Crypto or lots of other people.
They are too. Do you have examples of when they have done this?
My annoyance started when Violet Riga got me blocked on a totally spurious request and has both not been punished and has nor apologized. It is referenced earlier on, in the thread.
Which one?
I am quiet happy to have all my stuff up there provided other peoples is subject to the same conditions, but that does not seem to be the case.
I'd like to see some of these violations.
For instance I am chastised for not replying to people were as David Gerrard and most of the members of the arbcomm feel that they do not have to reply.
Sorry, can't answer that without a reference.
Or for instance why Pcpcpc would use a sock puppet to perform edits of extremely dubious quality and then not explain why he acted the way he did.
Unfortunately tracking sockpuppets is quite difficult. Can you provide a diff?
As for spam, the address is on several WWW sites as a contact so it is virtually impossible to make it worse and Spamihilator seems up to the job. I've also had this email for about 15 years now, which also means it is well known.
My concern about your address is about your *residential* address.
You'll find I have used a spell checker but there is no guarantee that word correctly spelt is the right word.
Spell checkers are notoriously innaccurate. They also can't check grammar.