If we're just using the statistics, and not the
original wording, it
should be fine, at least in the US, where courts
have ruled that mere
factual information is not protected by copyright
(even if the original
publisher went to a lot of trouble to collect it).
-Mark
This is what I figured also, though IANAL.
--Adam Raizen
But we should still respect the moral rights and name our sources, still. They're giving us all of this useful information, so the least we could do is respect their request to be named as the source. LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com