AFDs cannot conclude as a "merge". AFDs are meant to be a binary decision.
Something will either end up getting deleted or not. AFDs shouldn't go any
further.
- White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Noah Salzman wrote:
Makes sense to me. If the "articles for
deletion" process is usurped
by the "articles for purgatory" process then it transforms the debate
entirely. If you keep losing at chess than change the game to
checkers, rather than continuing to complain about losing at chess.
It's already happened, with articles for deletion replaced by "merging" on
the
grounds that merging is not deletion.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l