It's pretty obvious isn't it?:
1) Undelete it all.
2) Download it, converting all internal links to external links
3) Host it on some external site that doesn't claim to respect the GFDL.
4) Link to it from Wikipedia.
5) Redelete it on Wikipedia.
Steve
On 8 Jun 2007 at 23:54:56 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
> Risker wrote:
> > The simplest way would be to check MONGO's contributions for the period
> > around 0500 and 1800 on June 8th, but it appears he has reverted at least
> > some of his edits, and other people reverted other edits. Of course, some
> > people might consider that wikistalking.
>
> That sort of thing is what the user contributions list is _for_.
Then how come I got accused of "stalking" MONGO, by administrators no
less, on my user talk page and AN/I, for using it?
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
I posted this one a few days back; another keeper IMO.
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/umedia/20070420/cp.850292a055b2ece8b99a978d…
Get Fuzzy: April 20, 2007
----
en:User:Avraham
----
pub 1024D/785EA229 3/6/2007 Avi (Wikipedia-related) <aviwiki(a)gmail.com>
Primary key fingerprint: D233 20E7 0697 C3BC 4445 7D45 CBA0 3F46 785E
A229
---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Cheney Shill <halliburton_shill(a)yahoo.com>
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] We're famous!
> --- Earle Martin <wikipedia(a)downlode.org> wrote:
>
> > On 16/02/07, the wub <thewub.wiki(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Meanwhile in good comics{{POV-statement}}, Cat and Girl
> > had a typically
> > > philosophical strip featuring wp the other day.
> >
> > Is there any page in the Wikipedia: namespace where we
> > links to
> > webcomics featuring WP are collected? If so, shall we
> > start one?
>
> In case someone did, another on WP's legendary accuracy and
> NPOV:
> http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2007/04/29/
>
> For those of you in need of retribution:
> [[Non Sequitur (comic strip)]]
> [[Wiley Miller]]
>
> ~~Pro-Lick
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
> http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
Ah examples of pure crap deletions? This article has been nominated
for deletion because it's too short and doesn't include any trivia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_Airlie
"No biography, trivia, and birth date about him and it's too short"
It's about an actor, and required only one click on imdb to find out
whether or not the actor was notable enough for an entry--instead, the
article is up for deletion because some editor is a deletionist.
KP
"Daniel R. Tobias" wrote
> Wikipedia is often at its best as a place to find balanced, useful
> references about a variety of subcultural phenomena, Internet memes,
> and the like. Why should we cut off our nose by deleting them?
Absence of reliable sources? For the [[glurge]] deletion, it is presumably only a matter of time (if you are right and this is essential terminology).
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
Posting on behalf of the Election Committee,
Philippe
____________________
Dear all,
We, the election committee, hereby announce the opening of a new
election for members of the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.
At least three positions will be filled from this election, with the
elected members serving a two year term.
It is important to note that election processes are slightly different
this year than in previous years: all candidates should be certain to
thoroughly read the FAQ at:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2007/en
>From today, June 10th, we're accepting candidates for the Board of Trustees. If
you're interested, you must make a candidate statement and list
yourself on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2007/Candidates/en
We also need the help or translators for the elections, so if you're
fluent in any language other than English, and willing to help, please
list yourself here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2007/Translations
If you have any questions, please first read the FAQ, then list your
questions to the talk page:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2007/FAQ/en
The official announcement is available on Meta:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2007/en
We are confident that this election will draw very qualified
candidates, and we wish them the best of luck.
Regards,
Kizu Naoko (Aphaia)
Newyorkbrad
Philippe Beaudette
Jon Harald Søby
Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee, 2007
There is an article about greatly reknowned philosopher Chris Langham
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Michael_Langan , bar bouncer
and radical auto-diadactic thinker.
The article about his world inspiring (tongue twister here guys)
Cognative Theoretic Model of The Universe, led to an Afd.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cognitive-Theo…
.
Lots of the editors there wondered why he was in wikipedia at all,
never-mind his theories that have never gone through any kind of
peer-review.
Do you think that such articles will stand under the current BLP wipeout?
mike
On 7 Jun 2007 at 10:44:53 +0000, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Subclauses on IAR are irrelevant since there should never be any need
> to cite IAR.
The first rule of IAR is, you never talk about IAR.
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
I've just performed some radical surgery on an article called Bus
Uncle. This unspeakable piece of shit somehow managed to make it to
"Featured Article" status without anyone actually reading it. All
references to names of private individuals have now been removed.
I've also removed it from the Featured Article list.