Heya folks :)
Here's the Wikidata summary of the week before 2012-08-10. Looking for the wiki version? Here you go: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Status_updates/2012_08_10
= Development = * Updated demo system http://wikidata-test.wikimedia.de * Reset, undo, reverts and other cool things are working now (not on demo yet unfortunately) * Edit is now disabled if item should not be editable (e.g. in diff view) * Decided on how to solve messed up DOM structure of items around the page header * Decided on how to proceed with JS-API * All of the test coverage for Diff extension * Extended test setup on local test machine
See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/Current_sprint for what we’re working on next.
You can follow our commits at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/(status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions... and view the ones awaiting review at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions/...
= Discussions/Press = * Deployment (Italian Wikipedia community is discussing becoming the second to use Wikidata) * export to RDF http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/RDF * Signpost coverage of first deployment preperations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-08-06/Technol...
= Events = see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Events
* upcoming: Campus Party (If you want a ticket let me know. I might be able to get you one.) * I will give a keynote at FrOSCon * Denny will give a keynote at SMWCon
= Open Tasks for You = * We added new stuff here if you want to hack: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=need-volunteer&keywo... * Give feedback on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/UI_Layout_Concept#Phase_...
Anything to add? Please share! :)
Cheers Lydia
Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintscher@...> writes:
= Open Tasks for You =
- Give feedback on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Development/UI_Layout_Concept
These mockups seem focused on displaying data, with very little focus on search/organization (there is only a reliability filter in the mockups and a text search in some of them). If Wikidata is intended only as an infobox replacement for Wikipedia, that's probably fine, but if it is intended as a data backend for a wide array of projects, then entites will easily have hundreds or thousands of entries, which is unmanageable with the current interface. Some sort of tag-based filtering would be useful so that editors can get an overview of all the facts which describe when aspect of the entity (e. g. being able to tag the property "Country" globally as "geography" and then on the "Berlin" page being able to only view facts which are tagged as "geography").
The other thing I miss is some area editors could use to display important information related to the page, such as a warning label when there is a dispute going on. A freely editable area on the top of the page (like the one provided by LiquidThreads) would be nice.
I would also expect a link from each property name (like "Population") to a property page ([[Property:Population]] or whatever) which explains the conventions for that property.
Hi Tgr,
thank you for the input!
2012/8/12 Tgr gtisza@gmail.com:
These mockups seem focused on displaying data, with very little focus on search/organization (there is only a reliability filter in the mockups and a text search in some of them). If Wikidata is intended only as an infobox replacement for Wikipedia, that's probably fine, but if it is intended as a data backend for a wide array of projects, then entites will easily have hundreds or thousands of entries, which is unmanageable with the current interface. Some sort of tag-based filtering would be useful so that editors can get an overview of all the facts which describe when aspect of the entity (e. g. being able to tag the property "Country" globally as "geography" and then on the "Berlin" page being able to only view facts which are tagged as "geography").
This is correct. We intentionally left out the managing of a big number of statements to "later", as soon as we know how they are actually used. In short, in this case we go for "launch, gather data, refine".
There is the possibility of globally tagging properties, or about adding sections as with wikitext, or other options.
The other thing I miss is some area editors could use to display important information related to the page, such as a warning label when there is a dispute going on. A freely editable area on the top of the page (like the one provided by LiquidThreads) would be nice.
We are discussing solutions for that. There is still the talk page, which might provide some of the functionality for that, but not all obviously. As of now I hope that no such information is needed at all, but we will monitor usage and respond to needs. But again, something we don't want to start develop too early.
I would also expect a link from each property name (like "Population") to a property page ([[Property:Population]] or whatever) which explains the conventions for that property.
Yes, this will be the case.
Cheers, Denny