Hey folks :)
I'll be giving a talk about the state of Wikidata at Wikimania in Mexico City. Is there anything you think I should definitely talk about? Some great story? A useful project? Some nice numbers?
Cheers Lydia
2015-06-10 8:04 GMT+01:00 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintscher@wikimedia.de:
I'll be giving a talk about the state of Wikidata at Wikimania in Mexico City. Is there anything you think I should definitely talk about?
* How new properties can be proposed and created
* Magnus' brilliant tools, to make life easier
* How partner orgs can integrate their data, or identifiers
Further to what Lydia has written, I have also had a session proposal accepted for Wikimania:
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Building_up_Wikidata,_c...
Per the current schedule, it looks as if there is going to be a "Wikidata morning" on Saturday in Room D:
10 am -- Lydia "State of Wikidata - giving more people more access to more knowledge one edit at a time"
(10:30 coffee break)
11:00 am -- panel, led by Lydia "Ask Us Anything About Wikidata"
All your questions about Wikidata will be answered. Editors and the development team will be around to answer your most pressing questions about Wikidata.
11:30 am -- panel "Building up Wikidata, country by country"
What can national chapters and local Wiki-projects do to build up Wikidata?
This session will ask a panel from different countries what works to build up awareness and skills, and how to deepen the quality of Wikidata's coverage of a particular part of the world -- its people, places, history, events, organisations, culture, and every other related thing that ought to have a detailed comprehensive Wikidata item.
* What face-to-face events work, to build up knowledge and an active community? * How to assess current coverage, identify priority areas, and help groups to self-organise to improve them? * Are there special 'tentpole' projects the country has identified -- eg highlight focus areas, or particularly good data sources to align or assimilate? * What are the best tools and workflows to get things done?
(12:30 lunch)
I should stress that I proposed this session because these are questions that I would really like to hear some thought about -- not because they're questions I think I have any answers to!
I had hoped we might have been able to build up some experience in the UK, as to how to build up community structures to help editors to work on things -- but it hasn't really gone forward here.
On the other hand, I have been hugely impressed by some of the initiatives that Dutch-language Wikipedia seems to have taken, that people have mentioned in the last few weeks, to get people to make sure articles they have worked on on nl-wiki are properly described on Wikidata; and also what seems to have been quite an active and successful community engagement programme by Wikimedia France.
I'm sure there are a lot of other good tales to tell from other countries/languages as well.
So it would be great to have an idea of who might be likely to be going to be at Wikimania in Mexico who could take part in this workshop/panel, and present some of the things that have been going on -- and also (whether you're going to be in Mexico or not), what other tales are there, from different countries, that people should hear about ?
(for one thing, something I don't know, do we even know what information has been harvested from Wikipedia categories for people/places/things/events related to a particular country? And how comprehensive that harvesting has been?)
This session will only be as good as the community can make it, so it would be really good to know what ought to be in it.
All best,
James.
Oh. My. God. I love this. I'll be sure to attend, no matter what. This is a great idea!
L.
2015-06-10 13:10 GMT+02:00 James Heald j.heald@ucl.ac.uk:
Further to what Lydia has written, I have also had a session proposal accepted for Wikimania:
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Building_up_Wikidata,_c...
Per the current schedule, it looks as if there is going to be a "Wikidata morning" on Saturday in Room D:
10 am -- Lydia "State of Wikidata - giving more people more access to more knowledge one edit at a time"
(10:30 coffee break)
11:00 am -- panel, led by Lydia "Ask Us Anything About Wikidata"
All your questions about Wikidata will be answered. Editors and thedevelopment team will be around to answer your most pressing questions about Wikidata.
11:30 am -- panel "Building up Wikidata, country by country"
What can national chapters and local Wiki-projects do to build upWikidata?
This session will ask a panel from different countries what works tobuild up awareness and skills, and how to deepen the quality of Wikidata's coverage of a particular part of the world -- its people, places, history, events, organisations, culture, and every other related thing that ought to have a detailed comprehensive Wikidata item.
* What face-to-face events work, to build up knowledge and an activecommunity? * How to assess current coverage, identify priority areas, and help groups to self-organise to improve them? * Are there special 'tentpole' projects the country has identified -- eg highlight focus areas, or particularly good data sources to align or assimilate? * What are the best tools and workflows to get things done?
(12:30 lunch)
I should stress that I proposed this session because these are questions that I would really like to hear some thought about -- not because they're questions I think I have any answers to!
I had hoped we might have been able to build up some experience in the UK, as to how to build up community structures to help editors to work on things -- but it hasn't really gone forward here.
On the other hand, I have been hugely impressed by some of the initiatives that Dutch-language Wikipedia seems to have taken, that people have mentioned in the last few weeks, to get people to make sure articles they have worked on on nl-wiki are properly described on Wikidata; and also what seems to have been quite an active and successful community engagement programme by Wikimedia France.
I'm sure there are a lot of other good tales to tell from other countries/languages as well.
So it would be great to have an idea of who might be likely to be going to be at Wikimania in Mexico who could take part in this workshop/panel, and present some of the things that have been going on -- and also (whether you're going to be in Mexico or not), what other tales are there, from different countries, that people should hear about ?
(for one thing, something I don't know, do we even know what information has been harvested from Wikipedia categories for people/places/things/events related to a particular country? And how comprehensive that harvesting has been?)
This session will only be as good as the community can make it, so it would be really good to know what ought to be in it.
All best,
James.
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Hoi, As part of my work on the deaths of 2014 and 2015 I have harvested categories that were on the people who died.. It is why I have so many edits on my profile. It could not have been done without the tools of Magnus. It would not have been fun without them either.
My theory was that the connections to the people who died is what makes them relevant. Because they can be related to other people through their jobs, their profession and the awards they received.
The other reason why it makde sense to do it this way is because death is a great equaliser and it prevents the bias that is inherent in doing things by country. The bias is implicitly there because most people die in our wikiverse who are from the first world anyway.
Thanks, GerardM
PS I blogged a lot about my work on http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com
On 10 June 2015 at 13:10, James Heald j.heald@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Further to what Lydia has written, I have also had a session proposal accepted for Wikimania:
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Building_up_Wikidata,_c...
Per the current schedule, it looks as if there is going to be a "Wikidata morning" on Saturday in Room D:
10 am -- Lydia "State of Wikidata - giving more people more access to more knowledge one edit at a time"
(10:30 coffee break)
11:00 am -- panel, led by Lydia "Ask Us Anything About Wikidata"
All your questions about Wikidata will be answered. Editors and thedevelopment team will be around to answer your most pressing questions about Wikidata.
11:30 am -- panel "Building up Wikidata, country by country"
What can national chapters and local Wiki-projects do to build upWikidata?
This session will ask a panel from different countries what works tobuild up awareness and skills, and how to deepen the quality of Wikidata's coverage of a particular part of the world -- its people, places, history, events, organisations, culture, and every other related thing that ought to have a detailed comprehensive Wikidata item.
* What face-to-face events work, to build up knowledge and an activecommunity? * How to assess current coverage, identify priority areas, and help groups to self-organise to improve them? * Are there special 'tentpole' projects the country has identified -- eg highlight focus areas, or particularly good data sources to align or assimilate? * What are the best tools and workflows to get things done?
(12:30 lunch)
I should stress that I proposed this session because these are questions that I would really like to hear some thought about -- not because they're questions I think I have any answers to!
I had hoped we might have been able to build up some experience in the UK, as to how to build up community structures to help editors to work on things -- but it hasn't really gone forward here.
On the other hand, I have been hugely impressed by some of the initiatives that Dutch-language Wikipedia seems to have taken, that people have mentioned in the last few weeks, to get people to make sure articles they have worked on on nl-wiki are properly described on Wikidata; and also what seems to have been quite an active and successful community engagement programme by Wikimedia France.
I'm sure there are a lot of other good tales to tell from other countries/languages as well.
So it would be great to have an idea of who might be likely to be going to be at Wikimania in Mexico who could take part in this workshop/panel, and present some of the things that have been going on -- and also (whether you're going to be in Mexico or not), what other tales are there, from different countries, that people should hear about ?
(for one thing, something I don't know, do we even know what information has been harvested from Wikipedia categories for people/places/things/events related to a particular country? And how comprehensive that harvesting has been?)
This session will only be as good as the community can make it, so it would be really good to know what ought to be in it.
All best,
James.
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM James Heald j.heald@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Further to what Lydia has written, I have also had a session proposal accepted for Wikimania:
https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Building_up_Wikidata,_c...
Per the current schedule, it looks as if there is going to be a "Wikidata morning" on Saturday in Room D:
10 am -- Lydia "State of Wikidata - giving more people more access to more knowledge one edit at a time"
(10:30 coffee break)
11:00 am -- panel, led by Lydia "Ask Us Anything About Wikidata"
All your questions about Wikidata will be answered. Editors andthe development team will be around to answer your most pressing questions about Wikidata.
11:30 am -- panel "Building up Wikidata, country by country"
What can national chapters and local Wiki-projects do to build upWikidata?
This session will ask a panel from different countries what worksto build up awareness and skills, and how to deepen the quality of Wikidata's coverage of a particular part of the world -- its people, places, history, events, organisations, culture, and every other related thing that ought to have a detailed comprehensive Wikidata item.
* What face-to-face events work, to build up knowledge and anactive community? * How to assess current coverage, identify priority areas, and help groups to self-organise to improve them? * Are there special 'tentpole' projects the country has identified -- eg highlight focus areas, or particularly good data sources to align or assimilate? * What are the best tools and workflows to get things done?
(12:30 lunch)
I should stress that I proposed this session because these are questions that I would really like to hear some thought about -- not because they're questions I think I have any answers to!
I had hoped we might have been able to build up some experience in the UK, as to how to build up community structures to help editors to work on things -- but it hasn't really gone forward here.
On the other hand, I have been hugely impressed by some of the initiatives that Dutch-language Wikipedia seems to have taken, that people have mentioned in the last few weeks, to get people to make sure articles they have worked on on nl-wiki are properly described on Wikidata; and also what seems to have been quite an active and successful community engagement programme by Wikimedia France.
I'm sure there are a lot of other good tales to tell from other countries/languages as well.
So it would be great to have an idea of who might be likely to be going to be at Wikimania in Mexico who could take part in this workshop/panel, and present some of the things that have been going on -- and also (whether you're going to be in Mexico or not), what other tales are there, from different countries, that people should hear about ?
(for one thing, something I don't know, do we even know what information has been harvested from Wikipedia categories for people/places/things/events related to a particular country? And how comprehensive that harvesting has been?)
This session will only be as good as the community can make it, so it would be really good to know what ought to be in it.
All best,
James.
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Magnus Manske wrote:
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
Most of them are communes. Even tiny ones like https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42251 have articles in 33 different Wikipedias. It's a striking difference to basically all other countries. Overall, about one third of all items with articles on that many projects seem to be located in Italy.
The map can also be used to highlight other country-specific differences, such as the unusually large amount of orphan items in The Netherlands and UK.
Cheers,
Markus
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM James Heald <j.heald@ucl.ac.uk mailto:j.heald@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Further to what Lydia has written, I have also had a session proposal accepted for Wikimania: https://wikimania2015.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Building_up_Wikidata,_country_by_country Per the current schedule, it looks as if there is going to be a "Wikidata morning" on Saturday in Room D: 10 am -- Lydia "State of Wikidata - giving more people more access to more knowledge one edit at a time" (10:30 coffee break) 11:00 am -- panel, led by Lydia "Ask Us Anything About Wikidata" All your questions about Wikidata will be answered. Editors and the development team will be around to answer your most pressing questions about Wikidata. 11:30 am -- panel "Building up Wikidata, country by country" What can national chapters and local Wiki-projects do to build up Wikidata? This session will ask a panel from different countries what works to build up awareness and skills, and how to deepen the quality of Wikidata's coverage of a particular part of the world -- its people, places, history, events, organisations, culture, and every other related thing that ought to have a detailed comprehensive Wikidata item. * What face-to-face events work, to build up knowledge and an active community? * How to assess current coverage, identify priority areas, and help groups to self-organise to improve them? * Are there special 'tentpole' projects the country has identified -- eg highlight focus areas, or particularly good data sources to align or assimilate? * What are the best tools and workflows to get things done? (12:30 lunch) I should stress that I proposed this session because these are questions that I would really like to hear some thought about -- not because they're questions I think I have any answers to! I had hoped we might have been able to build up some experience in the UK, as to how to build up community structures to help editors to work on things -- but it hasn't really gone forward here. On the other hand, I have been hugely impressed by some of the initiatives that Dutch-language Wikipedia seems to have taken, that people have mentioned in the last few weeks, to get people to make sure articles they have worked on on nl-wiki are properly described on Wikidata; and also what seems to have been quite an active and successful community engagement programme by Wikimedia France. I'm sure there are a lot of other good tales to tell from other countries/languages as well. So it would be great to have an idea of who might be likely to be going to be at Wikimania in Mexico who could take part in this workshop/panel, and present some of the things that have been going on -- and also (whether you're going to be in Mexico or not), what other tales are there, from different countries, that people should hear about ? (for one thing, something I don't know, do we even know what information has been harvested from Wikipedia categories for people/places/things/events related to a particular country? And how comprehensive that harvesting has been?) This session will only be as good as the community can make it, so it would be really good to know what ought to be in it. All best, James. _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
On 2015-06-10 17:46, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Magnus Manske wrote:
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
I have just zoomed in my area (Delft, the Netherlands), and I see that many places are missing on the map, for instance, Naaldwijk, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1613459 , which has coordinates in both Wikidata and English Wikipedia. There must be smth wrong with loading data.
Cheers Yaroslav
Hi Yaroslav,
On 10.06.2015 22:01, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On 2015-06-10 17:46, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Magnus Manske wrote:
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
I have just zoomed in my area (Delft, the Netherlands), and I see that many places are missing on the map, for instance, Naaldwijk, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1613459 , which has coordinates in both Wikidata and English Wikipedia. There must be smth wrong with loading data.
As I wrote in my email, the link that I sent has a filter set to show *only items with 33 or more site links*. The item you mention only has 6 site links, so it is not shown. You can change the filter by clicking on the histogram at the top (drag interval bounds in lower view, fine-tune intervals using the arrow buttons on the top; click lower view once to reset the filter).
Here is a link to a piece of map where the item you are looking for can be seen:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
The item you are looking for is highlighted. When zooming in very far, it is a good idea to increase the size of the dots on the map (see Map Settings), since items are less dense on this zoom level.
To get used to the interface and the options, I would suggest you to pick the "births" dataset (upper left). It's smaller (=faster) and the histogram with birth year numbers is probably clearer than the sitelinks data.
Regards,
Markus
Cheers Yaroslav
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
On 2015-06-11 08:59, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
On 10.06.2015 22:01, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On 2015-06-10 17:46, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Magnus Manske wrote:
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
I have just zoomed in my area (Delft, the Netherlands), and I see that many places are missing on the map, for instance, Naaldwijk, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1613459 , which has coordinates in both Wikidata and English Wikipedia. There must be smth wrong with loading data.
As I wrote in my email, the link that I sent has a filter set to show *only items with 33 or more site links*. The item you mention only has 6 site links, so it is not shown. You can change the filter by clicking on the histogram at the top (drag interval bounds in lower view, fine-tune intervals using the arrow buttons on the top; click lower view once to reset the filter).
Hi Markus,
thanks, now I see the point. This possibly means that the info about Italian communes is more bot-friendly than the one from other countries, and mass-creation of such articles is easier. I can not otherwise imagine why such a big difference could occur.
Cheers Yaroslav
Hoi, The italians have categories for people who died in a particular place.. Given that it is in Italian, Italian places get a lot of attention :) Thanks, GerardM
On 11 June 2015 at 11:40, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2015-06-11 08:59, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
On 10.06.2015 22:01, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On 2015-06-10 17:46, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
On 10.06.2015 17:05, Magnus Manske wrote:
Some country-specific things to do on Wikidata:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/?country=96
Wikidata by country stats: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=290
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
I have just zoomed in my area (Delft, the Netherlands), and I see that many places are missing on the map, for instance, Naaldwijk, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1613459 , which has coordinates in both Wikidata and English Wikipedia. There must be smth wrong with loading data.
As I wrote in my email, the link that I sent has a filter set to show *only items with 33 or more site links*. The item you mention only has 6 site links, so it is not shown. You can change the filter by clicking on the histogram at the top (drag interval bounds in lower view, fine-tune intervals using the arrow buttons on the top; click lower view once to reset the filter).
Hi Markus,
thanks, now I see the point. This possibly means that the info about Italian communes is more bot-friendly than the one from other countries, and mass-creation of such articles is easier. I can not otherwise imagine why such a big difference could occur.
Cheers Yaroslav
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Gerard Meijssen, 11/06/2015 12:24:
The italians have categories for people who died in a particular place.. Given that it is in Italian, Italian places get a lot of attention :)
In detail: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Amministrazioni/Comuni_italiani in 2005 created articles for all Italian municipalities and https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:Biografie since 2006 handles structured biographical data in {{bio}}, both thanks to bots by User:Gac.
{{bio}} ensures all sorts of links to places and almost every municipality in Italy has had at least one famous person, so you're probably right in linking the two. I don't know how many translations on other wikis were bot-created; but probably not more than for the famous French municipalities? ;)
Nemo
On 10 June 2015 at 16:46, Markus Krötzsch markus@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
Another country-based observation is that Italian locations are so much more popular than those in almost any other country. Here is a map showing only those items with at least 33 (!) sitelinks:
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~s5219191/vizidata/#d=0&m=items&l=en...
Most of them are communes. Even tiny ones like https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q42251 have articles in 33 different Wikipedias. It's a striking difference to basically all other countries. Overall, about one third of all items with articles on that many projects seem to be located in Italy.
I love the stories that get told through maps like this. Someone has been hard at work on the regions of Soria (NE Spain), plus Bas-Rhin and Ain in France. Really sharp borders!
The map can also be used to highlight other country-specific differences, such as the unusually large amount of orphan items in The Netherlands and UK.
WLM-related historic site imports, I think...
Andrew Gray schreef op 15-6-2015 om 14:00:
The map can also be used to highlight other country-specific differences, such as the unusually large amount of orphan items in The Netherlands and UK.
WLM-related historic site imports, I think...
That's probably the 60.000 Rijksmonumenten (historic sites) and that bot run where someone created an item for *every* street in the Netherlands.
Maarten
On 15.06.2015 18:24, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Andrew Gray schreef op 15-6-2015 om 14:00:
The map can also be used to highlight other country-specific differences, such as the unusually large amount of orphan items in The Netherlands and UK.
WLM-related historic site imports, I think...
That's probably the 60.000 Rijksmonumenten (historic sites) and that bot run where someone created an item for *every* street in the Netherlands.
Yes, the streets dominate the dataset there. If you zoom in to Amsterdam and set the Map grid size to around 0.3, you can make out the channels from the dots ;-).
Markus
Maarten
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Of course it would be nice to speak about arbitrary access and how wikidata can be used to store references.
Also how to discover which properties to use, but perhaps it is better to ask, is it easy to discover which properties to use? At the moment the list is either manual, or all properties together in one page, it would be nice to have a better property classification system for Wikimania. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T59843
And other nice projects that happened during the year :)
Cheers, Micru
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
2015-06-10 8:04 GMT+01:00 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintscher@wikimedia.de:
I'll be giving a talk about the state of Wikidata at Wikimania in Mexico City. Is there anything you think I should definitely talk about?
How new properties can be proposed and created
Magnus' brilliant tools, to make life easier
How partner orgs can integrate their data, or identifiers
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
I'll be giving a talk about the state of Wikidata at Wikimania in Mexico City. Is there anything you think I should definitely talk about? Some great story? A useful project? Some nice numbers?
Development plan, e.g., do you expect unit support https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T77977 in the near or far future?
best Finn
Perhaps the Gene Wiki and other research-related stuff? The Wikidata for research session did not make it into the program. d.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Finn Årup Nielsen fn@imm.dtu.dk wrote:
On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
I'll be giving a talk about the state of Wikidata at Wikimania in Mexico City. Is there anything you think I should definitely talk about? Some great story? A useful project? Some nice numbers?
Development plan, e.g., do you expect unit support https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T77977 in the near or far future?
best Finn
-- Finn Årup Nielsen http://people.compute.dtu.dk/faan/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata