Ah, thanks, Luke. I thought it was constrained to only the main entity and not just any claims from a Wikipedia page. But it seems that the description is pretty clear there ...

Describes claims imported from Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia, either by

bots or manually. For other sources, use "stated in" (P248) (English)

Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:56 PM Lucas Werkmeister mail@lucaswerkmeister.de wrote:

I’ve added a second reference with, as far as I know, the preferred way to model this: “imported from Wikimedia project” + “Wikimedia import URL” (via the “permanent link” in the sidebar on the Wikipedia article). I’m not sure if a “retrieved” date should also be added.

Cheers, Lucas On 06.03.19 01:45, Thad Guidry wrote:

How are folks commonly giving references back to Wikipedia page mentions?

My use case seems to be causing a constraint violation and I'd like to know how to better handle that reference case.

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61976849

Thanks in advance! Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/

---

Wikidata mailing listWikidata@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

---

Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata