according to the Revision history of "Alois Rainer" (Q2650401) the item should not hold claim P570 (date of death)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2650401
the claim was removed in 2014
09:40, 20 July 2014 KrBot (talk | contribs) . . (3,531 bytes) (-371) . . (Removed claim: date of death (P570): 14 May 2002)
is there an explanation why the claim is still attached to the wikidata item?
Marco
Hi,
The bot removed one claim, but there was two identical claims (see the item before the removal : https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2650401&oldid=145856801 ).
2-1=1, this is logical.
Cdlt, ~nicolas
2017-10-21 13:59 GMT+02:00 Marco Neumann marco.neumann@gmail.com:
according to the Revision history of "Alois Rainer" (Q2650401) the item should not hold claim P570 (date of death)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2650401
the claim was removed in 2014
09:40, 20 July 2014 KrBot (talk | contribs) . . (3,531 bytes) (-371) . . (Removed claim: date of death (P570): 14 May 2002)
is there an explanation why the claim is still attached to the wikidata item?
Marco
--
Marco Neumann KONA
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
I see thanks Nicolas, would be nice to have a constraint here to allow for only one claim if the value is exactly the same.
in any event it's a false claim in this example and I will remove the claim now. 2-2=0 ;)
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON vigneron.nicolas@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The bot removed one claim, but there was two identical claims (see the item before the removal : https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2650401&oldid=145856801 ).
2-1=1, this is logical.
Cdlt, ~nicolas
2017-10-21 13:59 GMT+02:00 Marco Neumann marco.neumann@gmail.com:
according to the Revision history of "Alois Rainer" (Q2650401) the item should not hold claim P570 (date of death)
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2650401
the claim was removed in 2014
09:40, 20 July 2014 KrBot (talk | contribs) . . (3,531 bytes) (-371) . . (Removed claim: date of death (P570): 14 May 2002)
is there an explanation why the claim is still attached to the wikidata item?
Marco
--
Marco Neumann KONA
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Hi Marco,
Op 21-10-2017 om 14:48 schreef Marco Neumann:
in any event it's a false claim in this example and I will remove the claim now. 2-2=0 ;)
I undid your edit. You seem to be mixing up father ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2650401 ) and child ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15434505). Description also updated to make the difference clearer.
Maarten
thanks Maarten, there still seems to be a mix up with the data though, e.g. image information
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 18:49, Maarten Dammers maarten@Edamers.nl wrote:
Hi Marco,
Op 21-10-2017 om 14:48 schreef Marco Neumann:
in any event it's a false claim in this example and I will remove the claim now. 2-2=0 ;)
I undid your edit. You seem to be mixing up father ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2650401 ) and child ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15434505). Description also updated to make the difference clearer.
Maarten
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata