Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things: * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
* Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
* Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki romaine_wiki@yahoo.com wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
- A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts.
Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
- Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make
place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
- Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because
the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina
Let me know when you have created such list.
Romaine
--- On Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch swuensch@gmail.com wrote:
From: swuensch swuensch@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM
Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki romaine_wiki@yahoo.com wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
* A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
* Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
* Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
---
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two items. These get reported to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict many of the conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be nice if other would help working on this list. If a conflict gets fixed you should delete it from the list.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine_wiki@yahoo.com wrote:
All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina
Let me know when you have created such list.
Romaine
--- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch swuensch@gmail.com* wrote:
From: swuensch swuensch@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." < wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM
Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=romaine_wiki@yahoo.com
wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
- A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts.
Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
- Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make
place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
- Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because
the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttp://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttp://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would be really useful.
Thanks for the service.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote:
My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two items. These get reported to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/conflict many of the conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be nice if other would help working on this list. If a conflict gets fixed you should delete it from the list.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.com mailto:romaine_wiki@yahoo.com> wrote:
All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina Let me know when you have created such list. Romaine --- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch /<swuensch@gmail.com <mailto:swuensch@gmail.com>>/* wrote: From: swuensch <swuensch@gmail.com <mailto:swuensch@gmail.com>> Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." <wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>> Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict> This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in. Sk!d On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.com <http://mc/compose?to=romaine_wiki@yahoo.com>> wrote: Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help! I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.) With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things: * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot. * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.) * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in. Let's clean this mess up! Romaine --- http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with.
My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds descriptions from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself.
Sk!d
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Svavar Kjarrval svavar@kjarrval.is wrote:
Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would be really useful.
Thanks for the service.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote:
My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two items. These get reported to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict many of the conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be nice if other would help working on this list. If a conflict gets fixed you should delete it from the list.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine_wiki@yahoo.comwrote:
All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina
Let me know when you have created such list.
Romaine
--- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch swuensch@gmail.com* wrote:
From: swuensch swuensch@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." < wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM
Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in.
Sk!d
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.comhttp://mc/compose?to=romaine_wiki@yahoo.com
wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
- A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts.
Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
- Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make
place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
- Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local
because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttp://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttp://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing listWikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Thanks.
In the case of the Icelandic Wikipedia, disambiguations are only marked with the template ‚Aðgreining‘ ( https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sni%C3%B0:A%C3%B0greining). Don't think there are any variables supported so you'd only need to search for ‚{{Aðgreining}}‘ (case-insensitive).
With regards, Svavar Kjarrval
On 09/07/13 07:28, swuensch wrote:
Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with.
My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds descriptions from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself.
Sk!d
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Svavar Kjarrval <svavar@kjarrval.is mailto:svavar@kjarrval.is> wrote:
Could you also offer the same service for other wikipedias? Would be really useful. Thanks for the service. - Svavar Kjarrval On 08/07/13 23:05, swuensch wrote:My bot started his task. All items with pages to disambiguation pages and pages to none disambiguation pages will get reported to: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict> The nl community did a good job there are currently none (my bot scanned allready all articles starting wit 1 to Be). But there are other Conflicts meanly: same desciriptions and same labels at two items. These get reported to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/conflict <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/conflict> many of the conflicts are because the items should be merged or because someone removed a sitelink but did not correct/removed the label. It would be nice if other would help working on this list. If a conflict gets fixed you should delete it from the list. Sk!d On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.com <mailto:romaine_wiki@yahoo.com>> wrote: All disambiguation pages of the Dutch Wikipedia are in this category: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Wikipedia:Doorverwijspagina Let me know when you have created such list. Romaine --- On *Mon, 7/8/13, swuensch /<swuensch@gmail.com <mailto:swuensch@gmail.com>>/* wrote: From: swuensch <swuensch@gmail.com <mailto:swuensch@gmail.com>> Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Update nl-wiki & request for bot To: "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." <wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>> Date: Monday, July 8, 2013, 7:06 AM Hey my Bot lists disambiguation conflicts under https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk%21dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict> This list is little bit old but I can start the task again and update it. I also could start from nl wiki to make sure that with on every disambiguation conflict page there is a nl page. I only would need a nl category were the items with a Disambiguation Template are located in. Sk!d On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Romaine Wiki <romaine_wiki@yahoo.com <http://mc/compose?to=romaine_wiki@yahoo.com>> wrote: Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help! I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.) With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things: * A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts. Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot. * Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.) * Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in. Let's clean this mess up! Romaine --- http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <http://mc/compose?to=Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
In cs.wiki all disambigs starts with {{Rozcestník {{Rozcestník}} {{Rozcestník - foo}} There are no template redirects. But some articles about given names may be connected with (mostly english) articles, which are marked as disambiguations.
JAnD
On 09/07/13 07:28, swuensch wrote:
Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with.
My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds descriptions from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself.
Sk!d
Ah i had a little bug in posting the conflicts correctly. Now they appear on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sk!dbot/disambiguation_page_conflict
Happy solving. Sk!d
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Jan Dudík jan.dudik@gmail.com wrote:
In cs.wiki all disambigs starts with {{Rozcestník {{Rozcestník}} {{Rozcestník - foo}} There are no template redirects. But some articles about given names may be connected with (mostly english) articles, which are marked as disambiguations.
JAnD
On 09/07/13 07:28, swuensch wrote:
Yes of course I only need a Category or at least a Template to start with.
My bot than checks the links. And if there is no problem adds descriptions from https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-autoEdit.js and sets P107:Q11651459 with a ref to the start Wikipedia.
I paused this task a while ago because there where to many conflicts to work on and I don't have much time right now to solve them by myself.
Sk!d
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
For the bot removing interwiki links that are redirects etc my new code should be ready by this weekend (I hope) and this should give the lists I have a big clear out! :)
Addshore On 8 Jul 2013 04:32, "Romaine Wiki" romaine_wiki@yahoo.com wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
- A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts.
Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
- Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make
place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
- Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local because
the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
I just wanted to say thank you! That's truly amazing work.
As far as I can tell, more than 200 Million lines of wikitext have so far been removed from the Wikipedias. That's 200 Million lines that do not have to maintained anymore.
(I have not run the actual analysis yet, I have been waiting for the bots to finish their job, but maybe I should as it is pretty much exactly a year since I run the analysis on the pre-Wikidata age Wikipedia dumps).
You are amazing!
Cheers, Denny
2013/7/8 addshorewiki addshorewiki@gmail.com
For the bot removing interwiki links that are redirects etc my new code should be ready by this weekend (I hope) and this should give the lists I have a big clear out! :)
Addshore On 8 Jul 2013 04:32, "Romaine Wiki" romaine_wiki@yahoo.com wrote:
Today we reached at nl-wiki the situation that + 64% of the interwikiconflicts have been solved. A lot of this work has been done by the Dutch community, but also a lot of work is done by users form other projects, thank you very much for the help!
I have checked the complete template namespace and category namespace for local interwiki's and all are removed from these pages, so these namespaces are now clean on nl-wiki. If users from especially smaller Wikipedia's want to know on what pages of their wiki are local interwikis left, you can use AWB, download the latest databasedump and do a query on that dump. If you want to know what query you need exactly, e-mail me personally as the string of the query is a bit long. But it is even for noobs on bots and codes easy to do. (I can also do it for you.)
With doing all this solving of interwikiconflicts, we came across several things:
- A lot of biological conflicts are in our list of interwikiconflicts.
Certain genus do only have one species under it, what makes some Wikipedias make that together one article, while others want two articles as it are two layers in the taxonomical tree. One article on the English Wikipedia that created hundreds of interwikiconflicts was a list to which many redirects were linking which were used for interwikis. All have been removed with a bot.
- Another thing we notice is that a lot of renamings of articles to make
place for a disambiguation page haven't been proparly executed, as on Wikidata in an item of a group of articles, one of the links was to a disambiguation page. (It would be nice if a bot could check for disambiguation pages (based on the presence of a template from [[MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage]] on that wiki in it) so that we know where we need to fix this.)
- Another thing we see is that a lot of interwikis are still local
because the local interwiki links to a page that is a redirect because the page was renamed, while this wasn't changed by a bot. Most interwikibots do not recognize that the redirect is the same page as the one added to Wikidata. So we need a bot to remove all interwikis that link to a redirect linking to a page that is in the same item as the page where the local interwikis are in.
Let's clean this mess up!
Romaine
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Romaine
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Denny Vrandečić, 08/07/2013 13:16:
I just wanted to say thank you! That's truly amazing work.
As far as I can tell, more than 200 Million lines of wikitext have so far been removed from the Wikipedias. That's 200 Million lines that do not have to maintained anymore.
(I have not run the actual analysis yet, I have been waiting for the bots to finish their job, but maybe I should as it is pretty much exactly a year since I run the analysis on the pre-Wikidata age Wikipedia dumps).
FWIW there's http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesDatabaseWikiLinks.htm but it's not been updated for a while.
Nemo