Daniel - this distinction between facts vs claims -- is happy bullshit merely meant to calm the masses. A claim is a fact and a fact is a claim. It is the existence of PROVENANCE data in the Wikidata data model that distinguishes the two tools. Provenance data is at the heart of the web-of-trust, the top rung of the Internet architecture promulgated by the W3. So, if your view is that SMW is not for provenance data, while Wikidata is for provenance data, then how can I NOT conclude SMW is down-version? Why would I not TOSS SMW for Wikidata since they BOTH handle structured data? BOTH share a property: namespace? BOTH share code modules? BOTH have data-input (cf Semantic Form Inputs)? BOTH have formatted output (cf Semantic Result Formats).
:(this is what I was trying to communicate to Lydia in another note)
Provenance data certainly is important! It should be built in to an environment that rationalizes & integrates SMW, Dublin Core, and Topic Maps. See the [[meta:Wikitopics]] proposal for my first cut.
You make an interesting statement, "SMW one day could utilize _OUR NEW METHOD_ of storing structured data directly, without wikitext, but using it's own, simpler data model." -- friend, this is messianic at best if not confirmation of my dark concerns
John
On 13.06.2012 09:31, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
On 13.06.2012 18:04, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
Ok
then let me define it more clearly. Wikidata's clear goal is to serve the Wikipedias. Use in other contexts will also be possible and encouraged but Wikipedia is the main target. It is for a project that values references for all the structured data and it is supposed to serve a multi-language audience. SMW is well established and used in professional and non-professional projects outside of Wikipedia. It usually serves smaller wikis and has quite some use in companies for their internal knowledge management. Obviously there is overlap but in the end the projects are distinct enough to co-exist just fine. Markus wrote a long email about this here: http://www.mail-archive.com/semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03369... [1]
I'd like to expand on that a bit. Basically, the main
difference to me is:
- SMW is for managing primary data, i.e.
*facts*: "server X is located in room 123"
- Wikidata is for
managing *claims* as we find them on Wikipedia: "according to
report X
published in 2005, the population of China in 2004 was 12345678, +/-
1000, including Taiwan"
So, Wikidata's data model is much more
complex, and aimed at the type of
information we typically see on
Wikipedia. This allows is to provide extremely
fine grained provenance
data, but makes reasoning and querying a lot harder. It
also means
that mapping it to RDF is complex and awkward, not nearly as straight
forward as it is with SMW.
So, if you are working with factual data
and want to do complex queries, use
SMW. If you have data which
requires deep provenance information and are content
with simple
queries, use Wikidata (resp Wikibase).
However, we are working to
make SMW and Wikibase (the Wikidata software)
compatible where it
makes sense: we want to share code for unit conversion,
result
formatting, etc. And I could imagine (but that's just a vague idea) that
SMW one day could utilize our new method of storing structured
data directly,
without wikitext, but using it's own, simpler data
model.
Anyway, keep in mind that Wikidata is build by the same
people who initiated
SMW! They are very well aware of the similarities
and the differences. And we
believe that the target audience for SMW
and Wikidata *is* quite different.
-- daniel
-- Daniel
Kinzler, Softwarearchitekt
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher
Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
http://wikimedia.de | Tel. (030) 219 158 260
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens
e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts
Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig
anerkannt durch das Finanzamt
für Körperschaften I Berlin,
Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing
list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
Links: ------ [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03369...