Hi Stas,
Thanks for your interest, I didnt think about specific notability rules, but I start focusing industrial manufactured objects, maybe because I see direct use case on them (DIY Projects, Inventories, recycling, ....)
There are some open source hardware objects examples (Do it your self world like 3D printers etc...) in the project page, probably OS community are prone to be early adopters
- https://angryloki.github.io/wikidata-graph-builder/?property=P527&item=Q...
- https://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?q=Q25814150
Greetings
El dom., 7 de agosto de 2016 0:11, Stas Malyshev smalyshev@wikimedia.org escribió:
Hi!
Instead of generic articles of , for example, "Ballpoint pen" or "Bic cristal" it would be "Ballpoint pen Bic cristal 2014", using Wikidata propreties and doing these for millions of objects would allow people to have an open, free, universal and structured place to refer specific objects.
Some specific objects, e.g. works of art, buildings, ships, etc. are already well represented in Wikidata. I imagine there are notability rules of course. So your proposed one would have relaxed notability rules, no notability rules at all?
-- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@wikimedia.org
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata