Dear Guillaume,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Guillaume Lederrey glederrey@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Some very preliminary analysis indicates that less then 2% of the queries
on WDQS generate more than 90% of the load. This is definitely something we
need to better understand.
Is the data behind that available? I wonder if I recognize any of the top
25 queries.
(I guess the top 2% can be simple queries run very many times, as well as
hard queries rarely run, correct?)
Egon
--
Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are
available
https://i4oc.org/ available for innovative new uses
https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc. Join me in asking the American
Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too
https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations.
SpringerNature,
the RSC and many others already did
https://i4oc.org/#publishers.
-----
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (
http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage:
http://egonw.github.com/
Blog:
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList:
https://www.zotero.org/egonw
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory:
https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen