Am 09.02.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Magnus Manske:
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 11:27:06 Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de
<mailto:daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de>> wrote:
Am 09.02.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Magnus Manske:
My autodesc API serves both at the moment, so the
consumer can decide
which one
they want to use. Automatic descriptions can
"miss the point" sometimes,
but are
generally more up-to-date.
Can you post a link for us to play with?
Interface at
https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/
Example JSONFM:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/?q=Q3184929&lang=&mode=short&…
Thanks!
Just put them into wb_terms and not into the JSON.
They could be displayed,
added to search results, and put into "description dumps". Maybe these could
even be sqlite databases, as there is little point analysing automatic
descriptions for wording; you'd need these descriptions to display with an item,
so sqlite could be a way of getting them quickly.
Since wb_terms has one row per term, and a field for the term type, it would be
simple enough to inject "auto-descriptions". The only issue is that wb_terms is
already pretty huge, and adding automatic descriptions in *all* languages would
likely bloat it a lot more. Language variants could be omitted, but still -
that's a lot of data...
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.