Am 09.02.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Magnus Manske:
On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 11:27:06 Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de mailto:daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Am 09.02.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Magnus Manske: > My autodesc API serves both at the moment, so the consumer can decide which one > they want to use. Automatic descriptions can "miss the point" sometimes, but are > generally more up-to-date. Can you post a link for us to play with?Interface at https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/
Example JSONFM: https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/?q=Q3184929&lang=&mode=short&...
Thanks!
Just put them into wb_terms and not into the JSON. They could be displayed, added to search results, and put into "description dumps". Maybe these could even be sqlite databases, as there is little point analysing automatic descriptions for wording; you'd need these descriptions to display with an item, so sqlite could be a way of getting them quickly.
Since wb_terms has one row per term, and a field for the term type, it would be simple enough to inject "auto-descriptions". The only issue is that wb_terms is already pretty huge, and adding automatic descriptions in *all* languages would likely bloat it a lot more. Language variants could be omitted, but still - that's a lot of data...