Gerard – I think you’re missing my point. I’m not
suggesting this as a
display feature (which would be welcome and can always be generated by any
tool querying Wikidata labels) but as a contribution *stored* to avoid
future errors.
On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
Why not use Reasonator?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 27 November 2015 at 19:26, Dario Taraborelli <
dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Magnus, this is fantastic and works as expected,
thanks a lot.
One last note regarding the use of *different from* (P1889
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1889>). While I agree with
you that it would be overkill to generate all these relations for common
homonyms, for new items created by Mix’n’match with the above tweak, where
a single other notable individual was previously missing from Wikidata (and
when no matching label can be found), it would be tremendously useful to
automatically add a two-way relation (see for example *Grasulfo* (
Q3775839 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3775839>) <—> *different from*
(P1889 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1889>) <—> *Grasulfo *
(Q21571734 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21571734>). Having this
property added would save me 2 extra edits and permanently store
disambiguation signal for future reference.
Thoughts?
On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Luca Martinelli <martinelliluca(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
<3
L.
Il 23/nov/2015 21:05, "Magnus Manske" <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> ha
scritto:
> Done.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:25 PM Asaf Bartov <abartov(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dario Taraborelli <
>> dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 21, 2015, at 10:31, Magnus Manske <
>>> magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>> A soultion could be to change the "not on Wikidata" button (or link)
>>> to a "create new item" button. The new item would have a label, a
>>> description (maybe), a statement with the catalog ID (if there is an
>>> associated WIkidata property!), and "instance of:human" if the
entry is
>>> internally marked as "person", but nothing else.
>>>
>>>
>>> Would that be welcomed by "mix'n'matchers", and Wikidata
people? I
>>> think it would make sense, for catalogs with a Wikidata property at least.
>>>
>>>
>>> I would strongly support this, with the restrictions you suggest.
>>>
>>
>> +1. This would be good.
>>
>> A.
>>
>> --
>> Asaf Bartov
>> Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/>
>>
>> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
>> in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
>>
https://donate.wikimedia.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
> _______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org •
nitens.org • @readermeter
<http://twitter.com/readermeter>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
• @readermeter
<http://twitter.com/readermeter>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org