Hi Luca,
Op 5-3-2016 om 16:45 schreef Luca Martinelli:
Point taken, I apologise for using too dramatic tones.
Looks like more people are eager to get this over with and can't wait to get everything converted
Nonetheless, I stick to the point that probably a ">99% unique identifier" threshold is too high. Just to make another example (disclaimer: I asked for this property since it is yet another catalogue that my institution runs), P1949 has not been converted to identifier because it has "only 98.82% unique out of 507 uses", that translates in only *six* cases out of 505 items which have two P1949 identifiers.
That's correct. As I said in my previous email: We're first doing the easy properties. You can see the easy properties at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:ArthurPSmith/Identifiers/1 . The easy ones are the ones that have 99%+ single value and 99%+ unique. Compare that with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Addshore/Identifiers/1 and you'll notice we still have loads of easy ones we have to process (the unchecked list is still quite long).
Once we get those out of the way, we'll get to the more difficult ones. I prefer quality over speed here. I don't expect any problems with converting P1949.
Maarten