Re: [Wikidata-l] [OSM-talk] [OHM] Should we map former endonyms?

I think the problem is that we sometimes need to reflect more than just the single official name - at the moment we include multilingual names, which is great, and it's a bit of a backwards step to lose that ability for the past. Imagine if you're looking at an English or German map of Russia - all the names rendered with nice Latin-script equivalents - and you say "okay, show me a 1970s map", only for everything to become Cyrillic instead. :-) It becomes more complicated if you have cases where the name changes in some languages and not others, or countries with multiple official languages where it changes in both. For example, we'd want to be able to record that in English the city of Tsaritsyn became Stalingrad on a certain date, and then later became Volgograd, just as we record that in Russian it went from Царицын to Сталинград to Волгоград. However, as you can see at the moment, the "other names" are simple strings with no dates or modifiers, so we can't convey this information. (Switching the interface to a different language will display the alternative names in those languages) https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q914 Susanna: I'm not aware of what the plans are for this, but I'm reasonably sure we can't do it right now. However, I'm not completely up to speed on how dates/modifiers etc work, so someone on wikidata-l can no doubt correct me :-) Andrew. On 20 March 2014 13:24, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist(a)gmail.com> wrote: time? -- - Andrew Gray andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l