Am 21.04.2015 um 00:50 schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
On 20.04.2015 23:47, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
Something seems to be wrong with the order, though. Munich (pop > 1m in all statements) is listed way after Chemnitz (pop < 300k in all statements). Any idea why?
Good catch. My query was too simple (using one "random" population instead of the biggest one). Here is a better query, this time even with populations given:
I still wonder how the old result came about, since the *all* population values for Munich are much bigger than *all* the population numbers for Chemnitz. Even with picking a random value, how could the order have been reversed?