Yeah, there seem to be some cognitive dissonance going on here, it's weird.
Andy wants an item about himself.
I want policy, particularly the notability policy, to be applied consistently and honestly.
I raised the issue of notability; not a specific item, because it seemed apposite to the then-current discussion. (I responded to the comment "It is even said in the notability criteria that if we can clearly identify the concept, like with an id in some authority or national database, then it is notable." With evidence of a counter view being applied; it soon became clear that I'm not the only person to have observed this.
I'm not familiar with conversations on-list before I joined, but I also assumed the comment about cognitive dissonance was about the mismatch between policy and the general vibe that the community gives off about what is notable enough for inclusion.
I did not see the comment as something about a specific case, but as a more general issue.
Thank you, Derric Atzrott