Hoi, We are talking DSM. When the DSM had never called something a disease and never had a consistent presentation. When there is a lot of literature showing how that something is NOT a disease, why persist on what has always been wrong in any which case? Thanks, GerardM
On 14 May 2016 at 17:16, John Mark Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard Meijssen, 14/05/2016 15:39:
When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 says it is not. There is a huge problem.
Until recently DSM called homosexuality a disease, we must live with conflicts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Di...
In which case this fact is deprecated because there is a later release which contradicts it. We can not just omit a fact because it is 'wrong' now.
-- John Vandenberg
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata